Thursday, January 24, 2008

Christians & Film



Film is far and away the most prevalent artistic medium that our society interacts with and therefore it is no surprise that one of the fastest growing theological disciplines is that of theologies of film. Sadly the direction this field is headed (or is already in) is a bit concerning. Over the winter break I read through the most popular evangelical introduction to the theological analysis of film in Robert Johnston’s Reel Spirituality. Johnston, an evangelical uses his own "transcendent" experience he had while watching Becket with Richard Burton and Peter O’Toole to argue for film being an important avenue for experiencing the Divine. Working (dubiously) with Barth’s concept of “parables of the kingdom," Johnson describes the cinema as a place where God can meet men and women on their own turf. Since many in our society no longer see the need for church, movies are a legitimate medium for spiritual experiences.
Johnston along with other pioneers in the emerging discipline of theology and film rely on the work of Paul Tillich and Jürgen Moltmann. For Tillich the Divine Spirit is manifest in the human spirit in both morality and culture. In relation to film when we witness the power and ingenuity of the human spirit on screen we experience the uppercase "S" Spirit of God. Drawing upon the work of Moltmann the Spirit's work is extended to all of creation where we are faced with the paradox of "immanent transcendence" in all of life. Johnston interacting with Tillich and Moltmann writes, "If the Spirit is active in and through the human spirit, then the potential for the sacred is present across our human endeavor. Yet Christian theology, though it might give lip service to the presence of the Spirit in all of life, continues largely to ignore such works of the Spirit in the mundane, the ordinary experiences of life" (Reel Spirituality, 97).
It is interesting and rather predictable that the church’s relationship to Hollywood seems to be on a pendulum that swings from total abstention and disdain to sacramentalizing the big screen. What this tells me is that for those of us who love the medium of film and understand that for the forseeable future it isn't going away, we have the important task of teaching our people how to be movie watchers. The question isn't whether our people will be seeing movies, but rather what movies will they be seeing? Those of us who see the artistic value of film and recognize that it isn't going away any time soon must teach our people to go to the cineplex able to discern both artistically and theologically what they are seeing before them. Theological presuppositions such as a robust view of common grace and the image of God must undergird the experience of going to the movies. We don't go to movies to find God but to experience the artistic gifts of men and women made in the image of God. Like a great novel we go to films to understand human nature better. To experience worlds unimaginablly different than our own.
To conclude, Kevin Vanhoozer best describes our role as Christians as we seek to better engage the culture around us. "The church is to be a community of interpreters. The church interprets what is going on in culture by offering theologically thick descriptions that inscribe our everyday world into the created, fallen, and redeemed world narrated in Scripture" (Everyday Theology, 55). More later on what it means to make our people better interpreters of film and all of life.

3 comments:

Stephen Ley said...

Check out Through a Screen Darkly by Jeffrey Overstreet. He doesn't try to "reform" or fit cinema into a theological straight jacket. Film is a medium ill-equipped for such endeavors. Yes, we can glimpse the sacred in art, but your point is well taken about not trying to "sacramentalize" it.

Anonymous said...

Robert,
Hey! I'm ashamed to say this is the first time I've checked out your blog. No offense to you...I'm just not the blogger I used to be...or something like that. anyway, I enjoyed this post and look forward to reading more...as well as hearing your thoughts on the books for Dr. Godfrey's class.
Until Tuesday!

Justin said...

Robert,

I stumbled upon your blog and this post through a link on Clark's blog.

I just thought I'd comment. I am, as a matter of fact, a student of Johnson's, and I know what you are saying.

However, to his credit, his claim (at least when you talk to him in person) is not quite as strong as all that.

For example, William Romanowski over at Calvin College wrote somewhat of a criticism of him here:

http://www.calvin.edu/~romw/JCRmarch2007.pdf

Johnston took the criticism and said (and I quote) "He's absolutely right." lol

I think the charitable reading of Johnston is that he does not want to exclude the possibility of some sort of a divine encounter in film, but that he does not see it happening all the time.

For all practical purposes he ends up teaching (very well, I might add) some great methodology for getting at the heart of the meaning of a film and encouraging theological interaction.

The divine encounter stuff tends to be pushed a bit to the wayside in his teaching since it's not really verifiable or else turns out to be quite subjective. The end result is that when someone says that God spoke to them in some way through a film, you can't really tell them they are wrong.

Of course I'd like to see some better stuff coming out that gets a little deeper into helping people interpret and discern the stories out there and I think Vanhoozer's Everyday Theology is the best I've come across (Johnston is actually thanked on page 12 of that book as a series editor).

The emphasis over here at Fuller seems to be on making sure that you listen well; that you don't cut the artist off before you start telling them that they are wrong. This is their strong-point. Their weakness (and I've had this conversation with Johnson) is that if we listen forever, we never get around to critiquing or interacting.

I'm hoping that more reformed guys (like Vanhoozer) will write on theology and film. The fact is that Fuller is really the only seminary in America that really puts much energy into this stuff.

Anyway, sorry for the length of my comment, but before I go, I'll just recommend a couple other books:

Art and Soul by Hillary Chaplin (dutch reformed and teaches out in England), Eyes Wide Open by Rmanowski, Art in Action by Wolterstorff, Voicing Creation's Praise by Begbie.

There's some pretty solid stuff coming out on theology and the arts in general and I'm sure some good theology and film stuff will follow.

Great post!

Justin

winecheesandtheology.blogspot.com